brain/
← all entities
entitypersonpsychology

Paul Johnson

Co-author with Klein and Sonkin on applying pre-mortems to investment analysis (as introduced on this podcast)

Quotes

“that's why we feel as though the pre mortem is misused. Because they'll just say, okay, what could go wrong? And they think they're doing a pre mortem, but just that subtle framing kind of kills the effectiveness.”

“there are like four or five really nuanced things that if you don't get it right, the pre mortem doesn't work and they're very subtle. So just something as simple as having each person say one idea or that problem, reframing, saying that the project has failed, or requiring each person to say one thing. If you don't get each of those steps right, it doesn't work.”

2026-08-17-podcast-capital-allocators-best-of-pre-mortem-analysis-gary-klein· 2026-08-17#pre-mortem-analysis#group-decision-hygiene
Notes

Paul Johnson

One-line summary: Podcast / speaker: the 'what could go wrong' paraphrase kills the pre-mortem; the method is a set of small framing rules.

What they're known for

Co-author (with Klein and Sonkin) on applying pre-mortems to investment analysis. His load-bearing claim: paraphrasing the exercise as “what could go wrong” kills it.

Why they matter to psychology

Sharpens the misuse mode of pre-mortem-analysis so the wiki does not treat any risk brainstorm as a pre-mortem.

Said

Speaker-attributed claims extracted from diarized sources. Each bullet mirrors one entry in quotes: frontmatter — keep them in sync.

Sources

Related

Referenced by