brain/
← all entities
entityPWRstock-market

Quanta Services

Notes

Quanta Services

One-line summary: Quanta Services (PWR) is a large-scale electrical infrastructure and construction GC with a record $48.5B backlog — the deepest absolute order book of the datacenter electrical picks-and-shovels group — and 2026 revenue guidance raised to $34.7-35.2B.

What it is

Quanta Services is an electrical infrastructure and construction company executing large-scale datacenter site preparation, grid interconnection, high-voltage electrical work, and utility-scale construction. It serves utility companies, hyperscalers, and telecommunications customers, and is capable of acting as GC for major electrical infrastructure buildouts. Unlike VRT/ETN (equipment suppliers) or FIX (MEP contractor), PWR builds the electrical backbone — grid interconnection, high-voltage transmission, and site infrastructure — before the equipment goes in.

Why it matters to stock-market

Quanta carries the largest absolute backlog ($48.5B) of the datacenter electrical picks-and-shovels group, providing the deepest multi-year revenue visibility. US utilities committing $1.4T in capex to AI datacenter grid expansion (PowerLines analysis, 51 utilities) creates direct demand for Quanta's services. As the GC for grid interconnection work, PWR benefits from both the datacenter buildout and the utility grid expansion required to power it.

Valuation (August 26, 2026)

Last: $616.73 at the Aug 26, 2026 4:00 PM EDT close (+12.95 / +2.14%). From 2026-08-27-valuation-marks-ceg-pwr-ccj-etn.

Gage's judgment (as of ~9:22 ET 2026-08-27)

Gage last: $616.90. 12–18 months. Upside: about 25% ($770) if the big transmission jobs actually book (the work Austin said is still mostly in engineering, not backlog). Downside: about 25% ($460) if the AI/grid buildout slows and a rich earnings multiple shrinks. What would change it: backlog stalls, transformer/breaker internalization fails or gets architected around, or FY guidance stops rising while the multiple stays expensive. Gage's judgment, not issuer fact. From 2026-08-27-valuation-marks-ceg-pwr-ccj-etn.

Key facts (Q1 2026 — primary source)

  • Revenue: $7.9B (+$900M vs. $6.99B consensus); adj. diluted EPS $2.68; adj. EBITDA $686M
  • Backlog: $48.5B (+19% YoY — largest absolute backlog of the datacenter picks-and-shovels group)
  • 2026 guidance raised: $34.7-35.2B revenue, adj. EBITDA $3.49-3.65B, adj. EPS $13.55-14.25
  • Transformer investment: $500-700M over several years in power transformer manufacturing — vertical integration into the most supply-constrained grid component (36-month lead times)
  • 2030 EPS target: "opportunity to more than double the earnings power of this company by 2030"
  • Positioning thesis (Austin Q1 call): "execution certainty, labor certainty, supply chain certainty, schedule certainty"
  • Bridge power: PWR involved in genset/bloom bridge-power solutions for hyperscalers facing generation shortfalls

Key facts (Q2 2026 — primary source, 2026-07-30 call)

  • Revenue: $9.56B (beat ~$8.61B est by +11%); adj. EPS $4.24 (beat $3.29 by +28.9%); adj. EBITDA ~$1.1B. Stock +15.9% to ~$650.
  • Backlog: record $53B (up from $48.5B in Q1) — but the largest programs are still to come: Austin says "95% of it's not in backlog either. Those big projects, the 765 corridors, 345, 500, all that bigger work is just starting. A lot of it's in engineering."
  • FY2026 guidance raised across the board: revenue $39.3–39.7B, adj. EBITDA $4.1–4.2B, adj. EPS $16.45–16.95 (vs Q1's $13.55–14.25), FCF $2.0–2.5B — the raise puts the 2030 EPS-doubling trajectory ahead of schedule.
  • HICO high-voltage-breaker deal: extends the critical-path internalization from transformers to high-voltage breakers ("very difficult to get") — a second supply-constrained component now held in-house.
  • Electric-segment margin: 10–12% ceiling reaffirmed with "room for margin improvement in the backside" (underground).
  • Data-center content: self-perform "balance of plant" is "80% of what a data center would build, less chips."

CEO primary source claims

Related

Sources

Referenced by